Alsip Bros. v. Hard, Pearson, Cliye & Co.

38 Iowa 697
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided June 15, 1874·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— The plaintiffs brought this action to recover of defendants a balance due for work and labor performed, and materials furnished, in the erection of a foundry in the town of Decorah, Iowa. The amount claimed is $324.40.

This claim of the plaintiffs is not controverted, but expressly admitted by the defendants, who plead a counter-claim of $100.00, which they ask to have allowed as a credit on the claim of the plaintiffs. The court, on the trial of the cause, allowed defendants the sum of sixty-two dollars on their counter-claim, and rendered judgment for plaintiffs for the balance due.

There being no controversy upon the claim of the plaintiffs, we must regaid the counter-claim of the defendants as the amount in controversy in the action; and since this .amount does not “ exceed one hundred dollars,'’ no appeal lies to this court from the judgment rendered, unless the trial Judge shall certify that the cause involves the determination of a question, upon' which it is desirable to have the opinion of the Supreme Court. Code, See. ’ 3173. No such certificate is found in the record in this case. We are therefore precluded from passing upon the questions presented. The appeal must be

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alsip Bros. v. Hard, Pearson, Cliye & Co., 38 Iowa 697 (iowa 1874).

38 Iowa 697 (Alsip Bros. v. Hard, Pearson, Cliye & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Benttine v. Jenkins Truck Lines, Inc.
182 N.W.2d 374 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1970)
Buckland v. Shephard & Co.
42 N.W. 311 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1889)
Madison v. Spitsnogle
58 Iowa 369 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1882)