Alsabrooks v. Bank of Sparta

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Alsabrooks v. Bank of Sparta

97 S.E. 111, 22 Ga. App. 693, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 690

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 16, 1918

Docket9604

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 97 S.E. 111 (Alsabrooks v. Bank of Sparta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alsabrooks v. Bank of Sparta, 97 S.E. 111, 22 Ga. App. 693, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 690 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. A banking corporation is not charged with notice of facts which become known to its president while he is dealing in his private capacity and in his own behalf with third persons. Peoples Bank of [694]*694Talbotton v. Exchange Bank, 116 Ga, 820 (43 S. E. 269, 94 Am. St. R. 144).

Decided October 16, 1918.

Complaint; from city court of Sparta—Judge Johnson presiding. February 18, 1918.

Robert II. Lewis, for plaintiff in error. R. Li Merritt, Burwell & Fleming, contra.

2. The evidence demanded a finding in favor of the plaintiff, and the court did not err in instructing the jury so to find. None of the assignments of error which have the approval of the trial judge require a reversal 'of the judgment. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, G. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI