A.L.S. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

A.L.S. v. State

712 So. 2d 852, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8530

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 17, 1998

DocketNo. 97-307

StatusPublished

This text of 712 So. 2d 852 (A.L.S. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

A.L.S. v. State, 712 So. 2d 852, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8530 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

HARRIS, Judge.

We agree with appellant that the evidence presented below establishes that he committed burglary of a structure rather than burglary of a dwelling. See State v. Hamilton, 660 So.2d 1038 (Fla.1995). We therefore reverse and remand with instructions to amend the judgment to reflect burglary of a structure instead of burglary of a dwelling. If the sentence is thereby affected, then a new sentencing should be conducted.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DAUKSCH and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARRIS, Judge.

We agree with appellant that the evidence presented below establishes that he committed burglary of a structure rather than burglary of a dwelling. See State v. Hamilton, 660 So.2d 1038 (Fla.1995). We therefore reverse and remand with instructions to amend the judgment to reflect burglary of a structure instead of burglary of a dwelling. If the sentence is thereby affected, then a new sentencing should be conducted.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DAUKSCH and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

712 So. 2d 852, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/als-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack