Alropa Corp. v. Kirchwehm

Supreme Court

Alropa Corp. v. Kirchwehm

313 U.S. 549, 61 S. Ct. 1120

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJune 2, 1941

DocketNo. 1067

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 313 U.S. 549 (Alropa Corp. v. Kirchwehm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alropa Corp. v. Kirchwehm, 313 U.S. 549, 61 S. Ct. 1120 (1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal, 251 U. S. 179; Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 261 U. S. 114, 117; Herndon v. Georgia, 295 U. S. 441, 443; (2) Zadig v. Baldwin, 166 U. S. 485, 488; Live Oak Water Users’ Assn. v. Railroad Commission, 269 U. S. 354, 357-358; (3) Kryger v. Wilson, 242 U. S. 171, 176; Tinney v. Guy, 189 U. S. 335, [550]*550340; Johnson v. New York Life Ins. Co., 187 U. S. 491, 496.

Mr. Sigmund H. Stéinberg for appellant. Mr. Aloys C. Link for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal, 251 U. S. 179; Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 261 U. S. 114, 117; Herndon v. Georgia, 295 U. S. 441, 443; (2) Zadig v. Baldwin, 166 U. S. 485, 488; Live Oak Water Users’ Assn. v. Railroad Commission, 269 U. S. 354, 357-358; (3) Kryger v. Wilson, 242 U. S. 171, 176; Tinney v. Guy, 189 U. S. 335, [550]*550340; Johnson v. New York Life Ins. Co., 187 U. S. 491, 496.

Mr. Sigmund H. Stéinberg for appellant. Mr. Aloys C. Link for appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

313 U.S. 549, 61 S. Ct. 1120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alropa-corp-v-kirchwehm-scotus-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack