Alropa Corp. v. Kirchwehm

313 U.S. 549, 61 S. Ct. 1120
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 2, 1941·No. No. 1067·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal, 251 U. S. 179; Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 261 U. S. 114, 117; Herndon v. Georgia, 295 U. S. 441, 443; (2) Zadig v. Baldwin, 166 U. S. 485, 488; Live Oak Water Users’ Assn. v. Railroad Commission, 269 U. S. 354, 357-358; (3) Kryger v. Wilson, 242 U. S. 171, 176; Tinney v. Guy, 189 U. S. 335, [550]*550340; Johnson v. New York Life Ins. Co., 187 U. S. 491, 496.

Mr. Sigmund H. Stéinberg for appellant. Mr. Aloys C. Link for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alropa Corp. v. Kirchwehm, 313 U.S. 549, 61 S. Ct. 1120 (1941).

313 U.S. 549 (Alropa Corp. v. Kirchwehm) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hatton v. State Farm Mutual Insurance
521 F. Supp. 833 (S.D. Ohio, 1981)
United States v. Pink
315 U.S. 203 (Supreme Court, 1942)