Alropa Corp. v. Goldstein

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Alropa Corp. v. Goldstein

199 S.E. 833, 58 Ga. App. 658, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 90

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 17, 1938

Docket27119

StatusPublished

This text of 199 S.E. 833 (Alropa Corp. v. Goldstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alropa Corp. v. Goldstein, 199 S.E. 833, 58 Ga. App. 658, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 90 (Ga. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Felton, J.

Transfer in writing of negotiable promissory notes secured by a separate non-negotiable mortgage does not pass the title to the mortgage to the transferee of the notes, so as to entitle the transferee to sue in his own name on an obligation in the mortgage to pay the amounts represented by the notes (which had become barred). Alropa, Corporation v. Richardson, 58 Ga. App. 656 (199 S. E. —). The case of Mercer v. Raybon, 40 Ga. App. 23 (148 S. E. 749), is distinguishable because the mortgage was a negotiable instrument, title to which passed on delivery, and the action was a foreclosure. Accordingly the court properly sustained the general demurrer to the petition in this case, [659]*659which affirmatively showed that the legal title to the mortgage sued on was not in the plaintiff.

Decided October 17, 1938. Rehearing denied November 10, 1938. Billon & Rose, for plaintiff. Samuel L. Bplan, for defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens, P. J., and Sutton, J., eonour.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Felton, J.

Transfer in writing of negotiable promissory notes secured by a separate non-negotiable mortgage does not pass the title to the mortgage to the transferee of the notes, so as to entitle the transferee to sue in his own name on an obligation in the mortgage to pay the amounts represented by the notes (which had become barred). Alropa, Corporation v. Richardson, 58 Ga. App. 656 (199 S. E. —). The case of Mercer v. Raybon, 40 Ga. App. 23 (148 S. E. 749), is distinguishable because the mortgage was a negotiable instrument, title to which passed on delivery, and the action was a foreclosure. Accordingly the court properly sustained the general demurrer to the petition in this case, [659]*659which affirmatively showed that the legal title to the mortgage sued on was not in the plaintiff.

Decided October 17, 1938. Rehearing denied November 10, 1938. Billon & Rose, for plaintiff. Samuel L. Bplan, for defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens, P. J., and Sutton, J., eonour.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 S.E. 833, 58 Ga. App. 658, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alropa-corp-v-goldstein-gactapp-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack