Alrodo Corp. v. Carl Scheffer-Klute GMBH & Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Alrodo Corp. v. Carl Scheffer-Klute GMBH & Co.

464 So. 2d 1304, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 706, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12904

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 12, 1985

DocketNo. 83-2108

StatusPublished

This text of 464 So. 2d 1304 (Alrodo Corp. v. Carl Scheffer-Klute GMBH & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alrodo Corp. v. Carl Scheffer-Klute GMBH & Co., 464 So. 2d 1304, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 706, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12904 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court found that appellee breached an exclusive sales agreement, but that (1) no profit losses could be attributed to the breach because appellant had no profit history and its alleged damages were thus too speculative, and (2) the breach did not absolve appellant of liability for an indebtedness incurred prior to the breach. The court’s findings and conclusions will not be disturbed on either the main appeal or the cross-appeal because they are supported by competent substantial evidence. Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc., 418 So.2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court found that appellee breached an exclusive sales agreement, but that (1) no profit losses could be attributed to the breach because appellant had no profit history and its alleged damages were thus too speculative, and (2) the breach did not absolve appellant of liability for an indebtedness incurred prior to the breach. The court’s findings and conclusions will not be disturbed on either the main appeal or the cross-appeal because they are supported by competent substantial evidence. Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc., 418 So.2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

464 So. 2d 1304, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 706, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alrodo-corp-v-carl-scheffer-klute-gmbh-co-fladistctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack