Alpini, C. v. WCAB (Tinicum Twp)
This text of Alpini, C. v. WCAB (Tinicum Twp) (Alpini, C. v. WCAB (Tinicum Twp)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
CHRISTOPHER ALPINI, : No. 457 MAL 2021 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v. : Commonwealth Court : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (TINICUM TOWNSHIP), : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 4th day of January, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of
Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
(1) Is an employer that paid Heart and Lung Act benefits entitled to subrogation from a claim in which the employee was injured and asserted motor vehicle negligence- and Dram Shop Act-based claims?
Justice Brobson did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Alpini, C. v. WCAB (Tinicum Twp), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alpini-c-v-wcab-tinicum-twp-pa-2022.