Alpine Advance 5 LLC v. Storm Restoration Specialists Inc.

2025 NY Slip Op 31800(U)
CourtNew York Supreme Court, New York County
DecidedMay 16, 2025
DocketIndex No. 654025/2024
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 31800(U) (Alpine Advance 5 LLC v. Storm Restoration Specialists Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, New York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alpine Advance 5 LLC v. Storm Restoration Specialists Inc., 2025 NY Slip Op 31800(U) (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2025).

Opinion

Alpine Advance 5 LLC v Storm Restoration Specialists Inc. 2025 NY Slip Op 31800(U) May 16, 2025 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 654025/2024 Judge: Ariel D. Chesler Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. INDEX NO. 654025/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/16/2025

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. ARIEL D. CHESLER PART 62M Justice -------------·-------------------------------------------- --------X INDEX NO. 654025/2024 ALPINE ADVANCE 5 LLC, MOTION DATE 08/08/2024 Petitioner, MOTION SEQ. NO. 001 -v- STORM RESTORATION SPECIALISTS INC., ANDREW DECISION + ORDER ON FISHMAN MOTION Respondent. -------------------------------- ---------------------X

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 001) 2, 12, 13 were read on this motion to/for CONFIRM/DISAPPROVE AWARD/REPORT

Upon the foregoing documents, it is

Petitioner has moved before this Court in an Article 75 proceeding for an Order

confirming an arbitration award, post judgement interest on the award and reasonable counsel

fees. Proper notice of this action was given and Respondents have not submitted any opposition

to the petition.

BACKGROUND

The parties entered into a written contract dated June 17, 2024 (Verified Petition ,i 6

[NYSCEF Doc. No. 1]). The contract contains an agreement to arbitrate any dispute, including

issues of arbitrability, with the arbitration to be administered by Mediation and Civil Arbitration

Inc ("MCA") under its Commercial Arbitration Rules ("MCA Rules") (Contract ,i 42 [NYSCEF

Doc. No. 4). MCA Rule 32.1 authorizes service of a demand for arbitration by email (Id. ,i 8).

On or around July 8, 2024, a demand for arbitration was filed with MCA and MCA gave

notice to the Respondents in accordance with MCA Rule 5.5 (Verified Petition ir,i 10-12).

Respondent did not file an answering statement after MCA gave notice of the demand for 654025/2024 ALPINE ADVANCE 5 LLC vs. STORM RESTORATION SPECIALISTS INC. ET AL Page 1 of 5 Motion No. 001

1 of 5 [* 1] INDEX NO. 654025/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/16/2025

arbitration (Id. ,i 16). On July 31, 2024, Amanda Becker, as Arbitrator, made their award, on

default, in writing and awarded that $97,368.75 is due to the Petitioner from Respondents, jointly

and severally (Final Arbitration Award, NYSCEF Doc. No. 7). After the Arbitrator delivered a

copy of the award to each party on July 31, 2024, in accordance with MCA Rule 3 7, the

Respondents did not comply with the award within seven days (Verified Petition ir,i 18-21 ).

Petitioner commenced this action by filing a petition on August 8, 2024, seeking

confirmation of the arbitration award, post judgment interest at a rate of 10%, and counsel fees

connected to this application. Petitioner properly served the Notice of Petition on Respondents

(Affidavit of Service, NYSCEF Doc. Nos. 12, 13). To date no opposition to the petition has been

filed.

DISCUSSION

As an initial matter, this Petition is marked fully submitted and remains unopposed. The

Court need not go into a lengthy analysis of the relief sought. If it were to do so, the Petition

would be granted in part for the reasons stated below.

I. Confirmation of the Arbitration Award

CPLR § 7510 provides that "the Court shall confirm an award upon application of a party

made within one year after its delivery to them, unless the award is vacated or modified upon a

ground specified in section 7 511 of this article." The application to confirm must be made within

one year, which begins to run upon the delivery of the award to the moving party. The one-year

period is treated like a statute of limitations, thus generally depriving courts of discretion to

extend the period (Teachers Ass'n of the Tarrytowns v. Tarrytown Board of Education, 59

A.D.2d 890, [2d Dept 1977]).

654025/2024 ALPINE ADVANCE 5 LLC vs. STORM RESTORATION SPECIALISTS INC. ET AL Page 2 of 5 Motion No. 001

2 of 5 [* 2] INDEX NO. 654025/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/16/2025

Here, Respondents have not moved to vacate or modify the arbitration award, and no

evidence has been presented to the Court that the arbitrator modified the award in any way since

it's issuance. The arbitration award was delivered on July 31, 2024, and the Petitioner made this

application on August 8, 2024, well within the year limit.

Accordingly, the petition to confirm the arbitration award shall be granted as unopposed.

II. Post-Judgement Interest

Contracts are interpreted according to the intent of the parties, which is best evidenced by

what they express in their written agreement (Schron v Troutman Sanders LLP, 20 N.Y.3d 430,

436 [2013]; Greenfield v Philles Records, 98 N.Y.2d 562, 569 [2002]). Paragraph 40 of the

parties' contract states:

If ALPINE becomes entitled to the entry of a judgment against any Merchant or any Guarantor, then ALPINE will be entitled to the recovery of prejudgment interest at a rate of 10% per annum, or the maximum rate permitted by applicable law if less, and upon entry of any such judgment, it will accrue interest at a postjudgmcnt rate of 10% per annum, or the maximum rate permitted by applicable law if less, which rate will govern over the statutory rate of interest up until actual satisfaction of the judgment.

CPLR § 5004 sets the statutory interest rate at 9% per annum.

Here, the parties' contract unambiguously provided that any post-judgment interest shall

be at a rate of 10% unless the maximum rate under applicable law is less. While the Court can

acknowledge Petitioner's argument is unopposed, if the parties intended the interest rate to be set

at 10% regardless of applicable law it would have been worded differently. Therefore,

Petitioner's request for a post judgment interest rate of 10% is denied and the interest rate shall

be set to the statutory amount of 9%.

654025/2024 ALPINE ADVANCE 5 LLC vs. STORM RESTORATION SPECIALISTS INC. ET AL Page 3 of 5 Motion No. 001

3 of 5 [* 3] INDEX NO. 654025/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/16/2025

III. Counsel Fees

On an application to confirm, the court may entertain claims for any costs incurred in the

judicial proceeding to confirm the award (as distinguished from costs incurred in the arbitration)

(See Meehan v. Nassau Community College, 242 A.D.2d 155, 159-160 [2d Dept 1998]).

Paragraph 39 of the parties' contract states:

If an Event of Default occurs or ALPINE prevails in any litigation or arbitration with any Merchant or any Guarantor, then each Merchant and each Guarantor must pay ALPINE's reasonable attorney fees, which may include a contingency fee, as well as administrative or filing fees and arbitrator compensation in any arbitration, expert witness fees, and costs of suit.

Here, there is no question that the parties' contract contains an express provision for an

award ofreasonable attorney's fees should petitioner prevail in any litigation. Petitioner provided

an affirmation of attorney's fees which set forth Counsel's qualifications, hourly rate and time

spent preparing and pursuing the petition 1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Greenfield v. Philles Records, Inc.
780 N.E.2d 166 (New York Court of Appeals, 2002)
Schron v. Troutman Sanders LLP
986 N.E.2d 430 (New York Court of Appeals, 2013)
Teachers Ass'n of the Tarrytowns v. Tarrytown Board of Education
59 A.D.2d 890 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Meehan v. Nassau Community College
242 A.D.2d 155 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 31800(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alpine-advance-5-llc-v-storm-restoration-specialists-inc-nysupctnewyork-2025.