Alpi v. Long Island Rail Road

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Alpi v. Long Island Rail Road

223 A.D.2d 662, 637 N.Y.S.2d 938, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 675

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 29, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 223 A.D.2d 662 (Alpi v. Long Island Rail Road) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alpi v. Long Island Rail Road, 223 A.D.2d 662, 637 N.Y.S.2d 938, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 675 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunkin, J.), dated October 31,1994, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the defendants’ motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The defendants established a prima facie case for summary judgment. In opposition, there was insufficient proof submitted by the plaintiff to raise a question of fact as to the defendants’ [663]*663liability (see generally, Hsieh v New York City Tr. Auth., 216 AD2d 531). Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Copertino, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunkin, J.), dated October 31,1994, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the defendants’ motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The defendants established a prima facie case for summary judgment. In opposition, there was insufficient proof submitted by the plaintiff to raise a question of fact as to the defendants’ [663]*663liability (see generally, Hsieh v New York City Tr. Auth., 216 AD2d 531). Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Copertino, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

223 A.D.2d 662, 637 N.Y.S.2d 938, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alpi-v-long-island-rail-road-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack