Alphonso Jackson-Bey v. Wilmer Osborne Dale E. Lammers Robert Atherton Michael D. Adams

848 F.2d 191, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 6831, 1988 WL 50634
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedMay 23, 1988
Docket87-1176
StatusUnpublished

This text of 848 F.2d 191 (Alphonso Jackson-Bey v. Wilmer Osborne Dale E. Lammers Robert Atherton Michael D. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alphonso Jackson-Bey v. Wilmer Osborne Dale E. Lammers Robert Atherton Michael D. Adams, 848 F.2d 191, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 6831, 1988 WL 50634 (6th Cir. 1988).

Opinion

848 F.2d 191

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Alphonso JACKSON-BEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Wilmer OSBORNE; Dale E. Lammers; Robert Atherton; Michael
D. Adams, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 87-1176.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 23, 1988.

Before KEITH and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges, and ODELL HORTON, Chief District Judge.*

ORDER

This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the record and plaintiff's brief, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).

Plaintiff appeals the dismissal of his complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(d). Plaintiff contends that defendants subjected him to disciplinary proceedings for violations of prison rules which were not properly promulgated according to state law. See Martin v. Department of Corrections, 424 Mich. 553, 384 N.W.2d 392 (1986). This appeal was held in abeyance pending this court's decision in McDonald v. Michigan Dep't of Corrections, No. 86-1892 (6th Cir. Mar. 14, 1988), in which the same claim was raised. Upon review a panel of this court summarily affirmed the dismissal of the claim.

We likewise conclude that no federal constitutional question is presented by the alleged failure to properly promulgate prison disciplinary rules under state law. See Walker v. Mintzes, 771 F.2d 920, 932-34 (6th Cir.1985). Therefore, the judgment of the district court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

*

The Honorable Odell Horton, Chief U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Tennessee, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. Department of Corrections
384 N.W.2d 392 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1986)
Walker v. Mintzes
771 F.2d 920 (Sixth Circuit, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
848 F.2d 191, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 6831, 1988 WL 50634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alphonso-jackson-bey-v-wilmer-osborne-dale-e-lamme-ca6-1988.