Alpha Phi Alpha Senior Citizens Ctr., Inc. v. Zeta Zeta Lambda Co., Inc.
This text of Alpha Phi Alpha Senior Citizens Ctr., Inc. v. Zeta Zeta Lambda Co., Inc. (Alpha Phi Alpha Senior Citizens Ctr., Inc. v. Zeta Zeta Lambda Co., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.
Bureau Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter
Alpha Phi Alpha Senior Citizens Ctr., Inc. v Zeta Zeta Lambda Co., Inc.
2026 NY Slip Op 04166
July 1, 2026
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Alpha Phi Alpha Senior Citizens Center, Inc., et al., appellants,
v
Zeta Zeta Lambda Company, Inc., respondents.
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Decided on July 1, 2026
2022-01126, (Index No. 710037/14)
Cheryl E. Chambers, J.P.
Deborah A. Dowling
Lillian Wan
Elena Goldberg Velazquez, JJ.
McGlashan Law Firm, P.C., New York, NY (Patrick McGlashan of counsel), for appellants.
Bailey & Bailey, LLC, Springfield Gardens, NY (Lamont R. Bailey of counsel), for respondents.
DECISION & ORDER
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leonard Livote, J.), dated December 1, 2021. The order granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the second amended complaint and denied the plaintiffs' cross-motion, among other things, for summary judgment on the cause of action to impose a constructive trust on the defendants.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
As alleged in the second amended complaint, the Zeta Zeta Lambda Chapter (hereinafter the Chapter) is an alumni chapter of the Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity. The Chapter founded the plaintiff Alpha Phi Alpha Senior Citizens Center, Inc. (hereinafter the Senior Center). In 1994, the Senior Center donated approximately $20,000 toward the purchase of a building. The Chapter established the defendant Zeta Zeta Lambda Company, Inc. (hereinafter the Company). The Company originally was established as a tax-exempt entity pursuant to Internal Revenue Code (26 USC) § 501(c)(2). The Company's original 1995 certificate of incorporation stated, in part, that the purpose of the Company was "to hold property, collect income therefrom, and to turn over the entire amount less expenses to the" Senior Center. Additionally, "[t]o ensure that the Company would be governed by and remain an agent of the [Senior] Center, the Company's bylaws" contained a so-called "governance agreement," which "required at least three-fourths (3/4) of the board of directors of the Company would be members of the Chapter in good standing."
In June 1995, the Company submitted an application to the Internal Revenue Service to become a tax-exempt entity pursuant to Internal Revenue Code (26 USC) § 501(c)(3). The Company's March 1997 bylaws provided that its board of directors shall be composed of not less than 7, nor more than 21, individuals of whom at least three fourths shall be members in good standing of the Chapter. In June 1997, the certificate of incorporation was amended to modify the Company's name and to amend the Company's purposes. The new purposes did not expressly include turning over excess rents to the Senior Center.
The plaintiffs commenced this action against the defendants, inter alia, to recover [*2]damages for breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty. Prior to discovery, the plaintiffs moved, among other things, for summary judgment on certain causes of action, and the defendants cross-moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. In an order entered September 26, 2016, the Supreme Court, inter alia, denied the motion and the cross-motion.
In an order dated February 5, 2020, this Court affirmed the order entered September 26, 2016, insofar as appealed from (see Alpha Phi Alpha Senior Citizens Ctr., Inc. v Zeta Zeta Lambda Co., Inc., 180 AD3d 630). This Court determined that "[s]ince the requirement that at least three fourths of the directors shall be members in good standing of the Chapter was not set forth in the Company's certificate of incorporation, [a 2013] amendment to the bylaws to remove the requirement was permissible under N-PCL 602(f)" (id. at 632). This Court also determined that "the provision of the original bylaws which imposed that requirement is not enforceable by the Chapter as a contract," but that "the subject provision of the bylaws is merely evidence of the alleged governance agreement," and that "the failure to organize the Company so as to ensure Chapter control over director qualifications and removal raises triable issues of fact as to the existence and terms of the alleged governance agreement" (id. at 632-633). This Court also determined that "the provision of the original certificate of incorporation which stated that the Company's purpose was to turn over excess rents to the Senior Center is not enforceable by the Senior Center as a third-party beneficiary agreement," and that "the provision was merely evidence of an alleged third-party beneficiary agreement, and the record revealed triable issues of fact as to the existence and terms of this alleged agreement" (id. at 633). This Court also concluded that "[t]he remaining causes of action and cross claims all depend on the existence of the alleged governance agreement, the alleged agreement to pay excess rents to the Senior Center, or the directors' alleged status as agents of the Chapter, and there are triable issues of fact as to these issues" (id. at 634).
In September 2019, while the prior appeal was pending, the Supreme Court granted the plaintiff leave to serve a second amended complaint. In the second amended complaint, the plaintiff alleged 13 causes of action. The first 12 causes of action were substantially similar to those alleged in the original complaint and the amended complaint. The thirteenth cause of action, which was added to the second amended complaint, sought to impose a constructive trust on the defendants.
Thereafter, following discovery, the defendants moved for summary judgment dismissing the second amended complaint, and the plaintiffs cross-moved, among other things, for summary judgment on the cause of action to impose a constructive trust on the defendants. By order dated December 1, 2021, the Supreme Court granted the defendants' motion and denied the plaintiffs' cross-motion. The plaintiffs appeal.
"An appellate court's resolution of an issue on a prior appeal constitutes the law of the case and is binding on the Supreme Court, as well as on the appellate court" (New York Tile Wholesale Corp. v Thomas Fatato Realty Corp., 205 AD3d 727, 727-728). "The doctrine of the law of the case operates to foreclose re-examination of the issue absent a showing of new factual circumstances, additional relevant evidence, or a change in the law that would warrant reconsideration of the issue" (id. at 728 [citation omitted]; see
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Alpha Phi Alpha Senior Citizens Ctr., Inc. v. Zeta Zeta Lambda Co., Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alpha-phi-alpha-senior-citizens-ctr-inc-v-zeta-zeta-lambda-co-inc-nyappdiv-2026.