Alpha Electric Supply, Inc. v. Jewel Builders, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Alpha Electric Supply, Inc. v. Jewel Builders, Inc.

349 So. 2d 699, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16211

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 16, 1977

DocketNo. 76-1448

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 349 So. 2d 699 (Alpha Electric Supply, Inc. v. Jewel Builders, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alpha Electric Supply, Inc. v. Jewel Builders, Inc., 349 So. 2d 699, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16211 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Alpha Electric Supply, Inc., who was plaintiff in the trial court, brought suit for the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien. The case went to trial before the judge without a jury. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s presentation of evidence appel-lees moved for an involuntary dismissal which was granted. We reverse.

A motion for an involuntary dismissal is in the nature of a motion for directed verdict. The same law is applicable. If sufficient evidence has been adduced, though conflicting, which, when considered in the light most favorable to the non-moving party would establish a prima facie case in favor of that party, then the motion should not be granted. A trial judge may not weigh evidence when ruling on such a motion. See Tillman v. Baskin, 260 So.2d 509 (Fla.1972) and Realty Marts, Inc. v. Barlow, 312 So.2d 544 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). We simply hold that the record reveals sufficient evidence, which, when considered together with all the reasonable inferences deducible therefrom, established a prima facie case.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

CROSS, ANSTEAD, and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Alpha Electric Supply, Inc., who was plaintiff in the trial court, brought suit for the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien. The case went to trial before the judge without a jury. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s presentation of evidence appel-lees moved for an involuntary dismissal which was granted. We reverse.

A motion for an involuntary dismissal is in the nature of a motion for directed verdict. The same law is applicable. If sufficient evidence has been adduced, though conflicting, which, when considered in the light most favorable to the non-moving party would establish a prima facie case in favor of that party, then the motion should not be granted. A trial judge may not weigh evidence when ruling on such a motion. See Tillman v. Baskin, 260 So.2d 509 (Fla.1972) and Realty Marts, Inc. v. Barlow, 312 So.2d 544 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). We simply hold that the record reveals sufficient evidence, which, when considered together with all the reasonable inferences deducible therefrom, established a prima facie case.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

CROSS, ANSTEAD, and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

349 So. 2d 699, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alpha-electric-supply-inc-v-jewel-builders-inc-fladistctapp-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack