Alper v. City of New York

228 A.D.2d 390, 644 N.Y.2d 623, 644 N.Y.S.2d 623, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7488
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 27, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 228 A.D.2d 390 (Alper v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alper v. City of New York, 228 A.D.2d 390, 644 N.Y.2d 623, 644 N.Y.S.2d 623, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7488 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

Petitioners’ claim that they were ignorant of the law is not a valid excuse for failure to serve a notice of claim timely (Matter of Tricomi v New York City Hous. Auth., 191 AD2d 447). Renewal on the basis of the different excuse that an alleged confrontation between one of the petitioners and a City employee caused the former to delay commencement of legal proceedings out of fear of retaliation by the latter was properly denied on the ground that the new facts were known at the time of the original application. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gilliam v. City of New York
250 A.D.2d 680 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Perez v. City of New York
250 A.D.2d 688 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Embery v. City of New York
250 A.D.2d 611 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Winston v. City of New York
249 A.D.2d 404 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
228 A.D.2d 390, 644 N.Y.2d 623, 644 N.Y.S.2d 623, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alper-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1996.