Alper Karaali v. Petroleum Wholesale, L.P.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 12, 2013·No. 14-11-00577-CV·Published

Opinion

Order filed February 12, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-11-00577-CV ____________

TIEN SHAN, INC AND ALPER KARAALI, Appellants

V.

PETROLEUM WHOLESALE, L.P., Appellee

On Appeal from the 333rd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2007-46858

ORDER

On January 15, 2013, this court reinstated this appeal after the bankruptcy actions filed by both appellants had been dismissed. Appellant Alper Karaali has appeared pro se in this appeal. We ordered that unless counsel made an appearance on behalf of Tien Shan, Inc., the corporate appellant, on or before January 28, 2013, the court would dismiss the corporation’s appeal. On January 29, 2013, appellant Alper Karaali filed a pro se brief. Counsel has not made an appearance on behalf of Tien Shan, Inc. A corporation is required to be represented by a licensed attorney on appeal. See Kunstoplast of Am., Inc. v. Formosa Plastics Corp., U.S.A., 937 S.W.2d 455, 456 (Tex. 1996).

Accordingly, we order the appeal on behalf of the corporation, Tien Shan, Inc. DISMISSED. Alper Karaali’s appeal remains pending before the court.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Boyce and Donovan.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alper Karaali v. Petroleum Wholesale, L.P., (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Alper Karaali v. Petroleum Wholesale, L.P. (Alper Karaali v. Petroleum Wholesale, L.P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kunstoplast of America, Inc. v. Formosa Plastics Corp.
937 S.W.2d 455 (Texas Supreme Court, 1997)