Alonzo v. Holder
This text of 331 F. App'x 518 (Alonzo v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Julian Rodriguez Alonzo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order rejecting his motion to reopen for lack of jurisdiction. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing de novo questions of law, Singh v. INS, 213 F.3d 1050, 1052 (9th Cir.2000), we deny the petition for review.
The BIA properly rejected Rodriguez Alonzo’s motion to reopen for lack of jurisdiction. See Matter of Mladineo, 14 I. & N. Dec. 591 (BIA 1974).
Petitioner’s due process claims are unavailing. See id,, at 592.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
331 F. App'x 518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alonzo-v-holder-ca9-2009.