Alonzo, Quintin Lee

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 2, 2019
DocketWR-64,739-09
StatusPublished

This text of Alonzo, Quintin Lee (Alonzo, Quintin Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alonzo, Quintin Lee, (Tex. 2019).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-64,739-07 WR-64,739-08 WR-64,739-09

EX PARTE QUINTIN LEE ALONZO, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. W01-74583-L(C), W01-74561-L(C), AND W01-74559-L(C) IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 5 FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and

two aggravated assaults and sentenced to imprisonment. The Dallas Court of Appeals affirmed the

convictions. Alonzo v. State, Nos. 05-03-00234-CR, 05-03-00235-CR, and 05-03-00654-CR (Tex.

App.—Dallas del. Jul. 26, 2004).

Applicant contends, inter alia, that he is actually innocent of shooting the three victims. Ex 2

parte Elizondo, 947 S.W.2d 202 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Ex parte Franklin, 72 S.W.3d 671 (Tex.

Crim. App. 2002), citing Herrera v. Collins, 506 U.S. 390 (1993) and Schlup v. Delo, 513 U.S. 298

(1995). In support, Applicant presents the confession of Licho Escamilla and evidence supporting

the confession. The trial court finds, “Licho Escamilla, and not Applicant, shot and killed Santos

Gauna, and shot Israel and Cynthia Martinez.” The trial court concludes, “Applicant has met his

burden of proof—showing by clear and convincing evidence—that he is actually innocent of the

cases at issue.” The findings and recommendation are supported by the habeas record.

Relief is granted. The judgments in Cause Nos. F01-74583, F01-74559, and F01-74561, in

the Criminal District Court No. 5 of Dallas County, are set aside because Applicant is actually

innocent of the offenses. It appears that Applicant is released from incarceration on a habeas bond,

but if he is in the custody of Texas prison officials, Applicant is remanded to the custody of the

Sheriff of Dallas County. Applicant shall answer the charges as set out in the indictments, and the

trial court shall issue any necessary bench warrants and orders within 10 days after the mandate of

this Court issues to dispose of Applicant’s cases.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: October 2, 2019 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Herrera v. Collins
506 U.S. 390 (Supreme Court, 1993)
Schlup v. Delo
513 U.S. 298 (Supreme Court, 1995)
Ex Parte Franklin
72 S.W.3d 671 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2002)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Alonzo, Quintin Lee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alonzo-quintin-lee-texcrimapp-2019.