Alonzo Dee Freeman v. State
This text of Alonzo Dee Freeman v. State (Alonzo Dee Freeman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-10-00149-CR
ALONZO DEE FREEMAN, Appellant v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
From the 413th District Court Johnson County, Texas Trial Court No. F40226
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Alonzo Dee Freeman seeks to appeal the trial court’s “failure to grant Petitioner’s
Post-Conviction Motion of Discovery; under Art. 11.07, § 3 (V.A.T.C.C.P.).” The Clerk
of this Court notified the parties that the appeal appears subject to dismissal because:
(1) this Court does not have appellate jurisdiction in criminal law matters unless
expressly provided by law; and (2) no constitutional or statutory provision appears to
authorize such an appeal. See Kelly v. State, 151 S.W.3d 683, 686-87 (Tex. App.—Waco
2004, no pet.); Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. ref’d). The Clerk’s notice informed the parties that the appeal may be dismissed if a response
showing grounds for continuing the appeal was not filed within ten days. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 44.3. No response has been received. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
FELIPE REYNA Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Reyna, and Justice Davis Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed June 2, 2010 Do not publish [CR25]
Freeman v. State Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Alonzo Dee Freeman v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alonzo-dee-freeman-v-state-texapp-2010.