Alonza Dennis v. Charles Williams

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: November 28, 2022
• Docket: 22-6023
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6023 Doc: 15 Filed: 11/28/2022 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6023

ALONZA DENNIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CHARLES WILLIAMS, Warden PCI; BRYAN P. STIRLING, SCDC Director; HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Joseph Dawson, III, District Judge. (6:21-cv-00964-JD)

Submitted: November 22, 2022 Decided: November 28, 2022

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alonza Dennis, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6023 Doc: 15 Filed: 11/28/2022 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Alonza Dennis appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of

the magistrate judge and dismissing Dennis’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action with prejudice under

28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A. Confining our review to the issues raised in the

informal brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014)

(“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is

limited to issues preserved in that brief.”), we have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Dennis v. Williams,

No. 6:21-cv-00964-JD (D.S.C. Dec. 8, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED