Alonso v. State

712 P.2d 355, 1986 Wyo. LEXIS 446
CourtWyoming Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 8, 1986
DocketNo. 85-89
StatusPublished

This text of 712 P.2d 355 (Alonso v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wyoming Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alonso v. State, 712 P.2d 355, 1986 Wyo. LEXIS 446 (Wyo. 1986).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was charged and convicted of forgery under § 6-3-602(a)(ii), W.S. 1977 (June 1983 Replacement), and attempted forgery under § 6-l-301(a)(i), W.S.1977 (June 1983 Replacement). Appeal is taken from these convictions upon the theory that appellant could only have been charged under the credit card fraud section, being § 6-3-802, W.S. 1977, 1985 Cum.Supp.

It is seldom that an appellant confronts a case so nearly identical as Hutchins v. [356]*356State, Wyo., 483 P.2d 519 (1971), which involved the same statutes and contention. The same question was raised earlier this term in the case of Binger v. State, Wyo., 712 P.2d 349 (1986). Appellant in that case relied upon the same authorities as here argued and which this Court rejected. Disposal of this case is governed by the two before-mentioned cases.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hutchins v. State
483 P.2d 519 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1971)
Binger v. State
712 P.2d 349 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
712 P.2d 355, 1986 Wyo. LEXIS 446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alonso-v-state-wyo-1986.