Alonso v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Alonso v. State

348 So. 2d 1236, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16239

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 12, 1977

DocketNos. 76-2064, 76-2026 and 76-2027

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 348 So. 2d 1236 (Alonso v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alonso v. State, 348 So. 2d 1236, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16239 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find the appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error; therefore, the judgments appealed are affirmed. The judgment and sentence of the court in case number 76-2026 (trial court no. 76-2366); while indicating the appellant was to receive credit for all time served in jail, does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed as required by Section 921.161(1) Florida Statutes. Smith v. State, 310 So.2d 770 (Fla.2d DCA 1975).

Remanded for correction of sentence in case no. 76-2026; otherwise affirmed. Appellant need not be present for this purpose.

BOARDMAN, C. J., and HOBSON and GRIMES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find the appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error; therefore, the judgments appealed are affirmed. The judgment and sentence of the court in case number 76-2026 (trial court no. 76-2366); while indicating the appellant was to receive credit for all time served in jail, does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed as required by Section 921.161(1) Florida Statutes. Smith v. State, 310 So.2d 770 (Fla.2d DCA 1975).

Remanded for correction of sentence in case no. 76-2026; otherwise affirmed. Appellant need not be present for this purpose.

BOARDMAN, C. J., and HOBSON and GRIMES, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

348 So. 2d 1236, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alonso-v-state-fladistctapp-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack