Alok Kumar v. Roy S. Nutter, Jr. West Virginia University

Fourth Circuit

Alok Kumar v. Roy S. Nutter, Jr. West Virginia University

57 F.3d 1066, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21744, 1995 WL 352542

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 13, 1995

Docket94-2420

StatusPublished

This text of 57 F.3d 1066 (Alok Kumar v. Roy S. Nutter, Jr. West Virginia University) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alok Kumar v. Roy S. Nutter, Jr. West Virginia University, 57 F.3d 1066, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21744, 1995 WL 352542 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

57 F.3d 1066
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Alok KUMAR, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Roy S. NUTTER, Jr.; West Virginia University, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-2420.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 13, 1995.

Alok Kumar, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Michael Yurko, Jr., Amy Marie Smith, Steptoe & Johnson, Clarksburg, WV, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his Title VII, 42 U.S.C.A. Sec. 2000e (West 1981 & Supp.1994), complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kumar v. Nutter, No. CA-94-86 (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 26, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

57 F.3d 1066
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Alok KUMAR, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Roy S. NUTTER, Jr.; West Virginia University, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-2420.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 13, 1995.

Alok Kumar, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Michael Yurko, Jr., Amy Marie Smith, Steptoe & Johnson, Clarksburg, WV, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his Title VII, 42 U.S.C.A. Sec. 2000e (West 1981 & Supp.1994), complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kumar v. Nutter, No. CA-94-86 (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 26, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 F.3d 1066, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21744, 1995 WL 352542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alok-kumar-v-roy-s-nutter-jr-west-virginia-univers-ca4-1995.