Almy v. Allen

48 A. 934, 22 R.I. 595, 1901 R.I. LEXIS 55
CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island
DecidedApril 20, 1901
StatusPublished

This text of 48 A. 934 (Almy v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Almy v. Allen, 48 A. 934, 22 R.I. 595, 1901 R.I. LEXIS 55 (R.I. 1901).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

(1) The verdict is not against the evidence. The book of account for rents was properly admitted in evidence, as the defendant himself had first examined the plaintiff’s agent, who made the entries, as to its contents.

*596 Dexter B. Potter, for plaintiffs. Cassius L. Kneeland, for defendant.

(2) The newly-discovered evidence has' no bearing upon the case. It relates to an agreement to pa'y the defendant’s predecessor in title for the buildings on the land upon termination of the lease. If the defendant has any claim of this sort it can be enforced in a proper proceeding, but it does not operate to extend a tenancy.

Petition for new trial denied, and case remitted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 A. 934, 22 R.I. 595, 1901 R.I. LEXIS 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/almy-v-allen-ri-1901.