Almy v. Adams

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided June 1, 2022·No. 3:17-cv-00390·Unknown

Opinion

A AAtRtoOrNne Dy .G FeOnRerDa l 2 DAVID A. BAILEY, Bar No. 13661 Deputy Attorney General 3 State of Nevada 100 N. Carson Street 4 Carson City, Nevada 89701-4717 Tel: (775) 684-1163 5 E-mail: dabailey@ag.nv.gov 6 Attorneys for Defendants 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 KEVIN ALMY, Case No. 3:17-cv-00390-RCJ-CSD 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 13 ADAMS, et al., TO SUBMIT STIPULATION TO DISMISS 14 Defendants. 15 16 Aaron D. Ford, Attorney General of the State of Nevada, and David A. Bailey, 17 Deputy Attorney General, appearing under their Limited Notice of Appearance, hereby 18 submit this motion requesting an additional 30 days to submit the stipulation to dismiss this 19 case. This request is made and based on the attached points and authorities, the papers 20 and pleadings on file herein, and such other and further information as this Court may 21 deem appropriate. 22 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES 23 Courts have inherent powers to control their dockets, see Ready Transp., Inc. v. AAR 24 Mfg, Inc., 627 F.3d 402, 404 (citations omitted), and to “achieve the orderly and expeditious 25 disposition of cases.” Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 43 (1991) “Such power is 26 indispensable to the court’s ability to enforce its orders, manage its docket, and regulate 27 insubordinate [] conduct. Id. (citing Mazzeo v. Gibbons, No. 2:08–cv01387–RLH–PAL, 2010 28 WL 3910072, at *2 (D.Nev.2010)). 1 || LR IA 6-1 discusses requests for continuances. The rule states: 2 (a) A motion or stipulation to extend time must state the reasons for the extension requested and must inform the court of all 3 previous extensions of the subject deadline the court granted. (Examples: “This is the first stipulation for extension of time 4 to file motions.” “This is the third motion to extend time to take discovery.”) 5 6 This is the first request, and is requested for good cause. During a telephonic meet- 7 ||and-confer on May 27, 2022, Undersigned Counsel confirmed Plaintiff had not received a 8 || copy of the proposed stipulation to dismiss despite it being mailed and emailed to Plaintiff 9 |}on May 3, 2022. Undersigned counsel will caused another copy to be mailed to Plaintiff. 10 || The deadline to submit the stipulation to dismiss is June 3, 2022. ECF No. 53. 11 Therefore, the parties request an additional 30 days to file their stipulation to dismiss 12 ||this case, which would then be due on July 5, 2022, after adjusting for two court-non- 13 || business days. See FED. R. Civ. P. 6(a)(1)(C). 14 DATED this 30th day of May 2022. 15 AARON D. FORD Attorney General 16 17 By: /s/ David A. Bailey DAVID A. BAILEY, Bar No. 13661 18 Deputy Attorney General 19 Attorneys for Defendants 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 DATED: June 1, 2022. CS 24 UNITED STATES MA RATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Almy v. Adams, (D. Nev. 2022).

Almy v. Adams (Almy v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.
501 U.S. 32 (Supreme Court, 1991)