Almoravids v. Chase Manhattan Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Almoravids v. Chase Manhattan Bank

68 A.D.2d 998, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11279

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 22, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 68 A.D.2d 998 (Almoravids v. Chase Manhattan Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Almoravids v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 68 A.D.2d 998, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11279 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by employer-respondent to dismiss appeal as untimely taken. By decision filed June 10, 1977, the board affirmed a referee’s determination which found no violation of section 241 of the Workers’ Compensation Law and disallowed the claim. Appellant took no appeal from this decision but apparently directed several letters to the board seeking reconsideration. By letter dated December 13, 1977, the board advised appellant that no further action was warranted in his case. Subsequently, on January 12, 1978, appellant sent a mailgram to the board requesting an appeal of its determinations dated June 10, 1977 and December 13, 1977. Appellant’s attempt to appeal from the board decision dated June 10, 1977 was untimely (Workers’ Compensation Law, § 23) and employer-respondent’s motion is granted to the extent that the purported appeal from this decision is dismissed. Motion by appellant for extension of time to prosecute appeal from said decision denied, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Staley, Jr., Kane and Main, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by employer-respondent to dismiss appeal as untimely taken. By decision filed June 10, 1977, the board affirmed a referee’s determination which found no violation of section 241 of the Workers’ Compensation Law and disallowed the claim. Appellant took no appeal from this decision but apparently directed several letters to the board seeking reconsideration. By letter dated December 13, 1977, the board advised appellant that no further action was warranted in his case. Subsequently, on January 12, 1978, appellant sent a mailgram to the board requesting an appeal of its determinations dated June 10, 1977 and December 13, 1977. Appellant’s attempt to appeal from the board decision dated June 10, 1977 was untimely (Workers’ Compensation Law, § 23) and employer-respondent’s motion is granted to the extent that the purported appeal from this decision is dismissed. Motion by appellant for extension of time to prosecute appeal from said decision denied, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Staley, Jr., Kane and Main, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

68 A.D.2d 998, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/almoravids-v-chase-manhattan-bank-nyappdiv-1979.