Almonte v. Latortue

293 A.D.2d 431, 739 N.Y.S.2d 626, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3381
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 1, 2002
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 293 A.D.2d 431 (Almonte v. Latortue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Almonte v. Latortue, 293 A.D.2d 431, 739 N.Y.S.2d 626, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3381 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Klein, J.), dated August 27, 2001, as denied that branch of her motion which was to vacate her default in appearing and, in effect, denied that branch of her motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is modified by deleting the provision thereof denying that branch of the motion which was to vacate the default and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the defendant.

Under the circumstances of this case, the defendant has demonstrated both a reasonable excuse for her default and a meritorious defense to the action. Accordingly, the defendant was entitled to vacatur of her default (see, Loria v Plesser, 267 AD2d 213; DeRisi v Santoro, 262 AD2d 270).

However, so much of the order as, in effect, denied that branch of the motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint was proper. As no discovery has taken place in this case, the motion for summary judgment was premature (see Ross v Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Elec. Co., 81 NY2d 494; Brown v County of Nassau, 226 AD2d 492). Altman, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Salon Ignazia, Inc.
34 A.D.3d 821 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Wright v. Shapiro
16 A.D.3d 1042 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Berry v. Aquila Realty Co.
6 A.D.3d 563 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Newsome v. Akins
6 A.D.3d 512 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Talisveyber v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.
4 A.D.3d 367 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Rajan v. Harvey Insler
300 A.D.2d 463 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Holt Construction Corp. v. J & R Music World, Inc.
294 A.D.2d 540 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
293 A.D.2d 431, 739 N.Y.S.2d 626, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/almonte-v-latortue-nyappdiv-2002.