Almonor v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Almonor v. Selsky

241 A.D.2d 584, 660 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7243

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 3, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 241 A.D.2d 584 (Almonor v. Selsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Almonor v. Selsky, 241 A.D.2d 584, 660 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7243 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Following a prison disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of creating a disturbance and interfering with a staff member. Presented in evidence at the hearing was the misbehavior report, describing in detail the confrontation which took place between petitioner and correction officers when petitioner attempted the unauthorized transfer of a typewriter from his cell to the prison law library. The account set forth in the misbehavior report was by itself sufficiently detailed and probative to constitute substantial evidence of petitioner’s guilt (see, Matter of Foster v Coughlin, 76 NY2d 964, 966). The determination is, accordingly, confirmed.

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Following a prison disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of creating a disturbance and interfering with a staff member. Presented in evidence at the hearing was the misbehavior report, describing in detail the confrontation which took place between petitioner and correction officers when petitioner attempted the unauthorized transfer of a typewriter from his cell to the prison law library. The account set forth in the misbehavior report was by itself sufficiently detailed and probative to constitute substantial evidence of petitioner’s guilt (see, Matter of Foster v Coughlin, 76 NY2d 964, 966). The determination is, accordingly, confirmed.

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

241 A.D.2d 584, 660 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/almonor-v-selsky-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack