Almobarak v. State

724 S.W.2d 180, 291 Ark. 313, 1987 Ark. LEXIS 1957
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedFebruary 23, 1987
StatusPublished

This text of 724 S.W.2d 180 (Almobarak v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Almobarak v. State, 724 S.W.2d 180, 291 Ark. 313, 1987 Ark. LEXIS 1957 (Ark. 1987).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner, Omar Almobarak, by his attorney, D. Scott Hickam, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to his miscalculation of the ninety-day limit for filing the record in this court. See Ark. R. App. P. 5(a).

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, a good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam dated February 5, 1979, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243 (1981).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
724 S.W.2d 180, 291 Ark. 313, 1987 Ark. LEXIS 1957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/almobarak-v-state-ark-1987.