Almericas Veterans Mortgage Trust v. Village Capital & Investment, LLC and Brock & Scott, PLLC

• Court: Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
• Decided: June 12, 2026
• Docket: 03-26-00466-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-26-00466-CV

Almericas Veterans Mortgage Trust, Appellant

v.

Village Capital & Investment, LLC and Brock & Scott, PLLC, Appellees

FROM THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY NO. 26-1248-C368, THE HONORABLE SARAH SOELDNER BRUCHMILLER, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Almericas Veterans Mortgage Trust, by its pro se trustee Ronnie Dansby, filed a

notice of appeal from the trial court’s May 14, 2026 order against it. After an initial review, we

informed Dansby that a trustee or other representative of a trust may not appear pro se in a

representative capacity, and therefore, an attorney representing the trust must file an amended

notice of appeal to avoid dismissal of this appeal. No attorney has responded on behalf of the

Almericas Veterans Mortgage Trust. Dansby filed a response in which he maintained his right to

represent the trust pro se.

A trustee may not appear pro se in his representative capacity as a trustee. Lorie

Bernice Sharpe Tr. v. Phung, 622 S.W.3d 929, 929 (Tex. App.—Austin 2021, no pet.); see In re

Guetersloh, 326 S.W.3d 737, 739–40 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2010, orig. proceeding) (holding that

trustee may not appear pro se in representative capacity as trustee of trust); see also, e.g., Steele v. McDonald, 202 S.W.3d 926, 928 (Tex. App.—Waco 2006, no pet.) (holding that independent

executor may not appear pro se in representative capacity for estate). Rule 7 of the Texas Rules

of Civil Procedure allows a person to represent himself or herself pro se only to litigate rights on

his or her own behalf, not to litigate rights in a representative capacity. Tex. R. Civ. P. 7; see Lorie

Bernice Sharpe Tr., 622 S.W.3d at 929 (holding that trustee may not appear pro se in representative

capacity as trustee of trust).

According to Texas law, only a licensed attorney is allowed to represent other

parties. See Tex. Gov’t Code §§ 81.101–.102 (prohibiting practice of law in Texas unless person

is member of state bar); id. §§ 83.001–.006 (prohibiting unlicensed persons from practicing law

without a license); see also Jimison v. Mann, 957 S.W.2d 860, 861 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 1997,

order) (per curiam) (striking documents filed by layperson having no authority to file them on

behalf of another). The Texas Legislature has defined the practice of law to include, among other

things, “the preparation of a pleading or other document incident to an action.” Tex. Gov’t Code

§ 81.101(a). Consequently, if a nonattorney files documents on behalf of a trust in an appeal, this

amounts to the unauthorized practice of law. See In re Guetersloh, 326 S.W.3d at 740 (concluding

nonattorney’s appearance in trial court on behalf of trust amounted to unauthorized practice

of law).

Therefore, because a nonattorney trustee cannot represent a trust, and no attorney

has filed an amended notice of appeal on behalf of the Almericas Veterans Mortgage Trust, we

dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).

2 __________________________________________ Rosa Lopez Theofanis, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Theofanis and Crump

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: June 12, 2026