Almazon v. JP Morgan Chase Bank

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided September 11, 2024·No. 1:24-cv-05415·Unknown

Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC #: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: DOINA ALMAZON, Plaintiff, 24-CV-5415 (VEC) (BCM) -against- ORDER JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, Defendant.

BARBARA MOSES, United States Magistrate Judge. In my Order Adjourning Case Management Conference, dated September 9, 2024 (Dkt. 21), I noted that defendant's motion to dismiss (Dkt. 9) was fully briefed. Since then, however, plaintiff filed an unauthorized sur-reply in further opposition to the motion (Dkt. 22) and defendant filed a letter objecting to the sur-reply and asking that the Court "reject" it. (Dkt. 23.) "In this Court, '[l]itigation, including motion practice, is an ordered process. Local Civil Rule 6.1 provides for opening papers, opposition papers, and reply papers, in that order.'" Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Gottlieb, 2023 WL 6294328, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 27, 2023) (alteration in original) (quoting Paravas v. Cerf, 2022 WL 203168 (S.D.N.Y. 2022)). "Additional papers, filed without authorization from the Court, can be disregarded as unfair to the opposing party." Jd.; see also Lawtone-Bowles vy. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n as Tr. for Holders of MLMI Tr. 2002-AFC Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2002-AFC1, 2021 WL 1518329, at *1 n.3 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 16, 2021) ("The Court need not consider a sur-reply or sur-sur-reply where permission was neither sought nor granted, and Plaintiff's pro se status does not absolve her from complying with this Court's rules[.]") (citations omitted), aff'd sub nom. Lawtone-Bowles v. Brown, 2022 WL 839280 (2d Cir. Mar. 22, 2022). The Court will disregard both plaintiff's unauthorized sur-reply and defendant's responding letter. In the absence of a material change in governing law, the Court will not accept further briefing on the motion to dismiss. "Should plaintiff persist in filing multiple or seriatim letter-briefs or other motion papers, beyond those permitted by Local Civ. R. 6.1 and [this Court's individual practices], the Court will not hesitate to strike them." Adams v. Co-op City Dep't of Pub. Safety, 2024 WL 402856, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 2, 2024). Dated: New York, New York September 11, 2024 SO ORDERED. Calwickeu BARBARA MOSES United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Almazon v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

Almazon v. JP Morgan Chase Bank (Almazon v. JP Morgan Chase Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.