Almazan v. United States

88 F. App'x 199

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Footnotes

•

*

Because renewal of a contract is a discretionary function excluded from the Federal Tort Claims Act’s waiver of sovereign immunity, the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to consider Almazan’s claims to the extent they are premised on failure to renew her contract. 28 U.S.C. § 2680(a); United States v. Gaubert, 499 U.S. 315, 322, 111 S.Ct. 1267, 113 L.Ed.2d 335 (1991); Gen. Dynamics Corp. v. United States, 139 F.3d 1280, 1283 (9th Cir. 1998).

To the extent that Almazan asserts claims premised on discrimination, those claims are time-barred by 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b). Lehman v. United States, 154 F.3d 1010, 1013 (9th Cir.1998); Parker v. United States, 935 F.2d 176, 177 (9th Cir. 1991).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.