Almaz Nezirovic v. Gerald Holt
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7533
ALMAZ NEZIROVIC,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
GERALD S. HOLT, United States Marshal, Western District of Virginia; BOBBY D. RUSSELL, Superintendent, Western Virginia Regional Jail,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, District Judge. (7:13-cv-00428-MFU)
Submitted: March 31, 2015 Decided: April 10, 2015
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KEENAN and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Almaz Nezirovic, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth G. Wright, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Almaz Nezirovic appeals from the district court’s order
denying his motion for bond filed in his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012)
proceeding. In light of the district court’s denial of the 28
U.S.C. § 2241 petition and our decision affirming the district
court’s order, see Nezirovic v. Holt, 779 F.3d 233, 2015 WL
777540 (4th Cir. Feb. 25, 2015) (No. 14-6468), Nezirovic’s
appeal of the order denying his motion for release on bond is
now moot. See Incumaa v. Ozmint, 507 F.3d 281, 285-86 (4th Cir.
2007) (setting forth the principles of appellate mootness).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as moot. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Almaz Nezirovic v. Gerald Holt (Almaz Nezirovic v. Gerald Holt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.