Almar Bristle & Hair Processing Co. v. United States
45 Cust. Ct. 286
United States Customs Court·Decided September 27, 1960·No. No. 64585; protests 317494-K(A), etc. (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic filaments similar in all material respects to those the subject of Empire Brushes, Inc., et al. v. United States (42 Cust. Ct. 145, C.D. 2078), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Almar Bristle & Hair Processing Co. v. United States, 45 Cust. Ct. 286 (cusc 1960).
45 Cust. Ct. 286 (Almar Bristle & Hair Processing Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Empire Brushes, Inc. v. United States
42 Cust. Ct. 145 (U.S. Customs Court, 1959)