Home/U.S. Customs Court/Almar Bristle & Hair Processing Co. v. United States

Almar Bristle & Hair Processing Co. v. United States

45 Cust. Ct. 286
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedSeptember 27, 1960
DocketNo. 64585; protests 317494-K(A), etc. (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 45 Cust. Ct. 286 (Almar Bristle & Hair Processing Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Almar Bristle & Hair Processing Co. v. United States, 45 Cust. Ct. 286 (cusc 1960).

Opinion

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic filaments similar in all material respects to those the subject of Empire Brushes, Inc., et al. v. United States (42 Cust. Ct. 145, C.D. 2078), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Empire Brushes, Inc. v. United States
42 Cust. Ct. 145 (U.S. Customs Court, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 Cust. Ct. 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/almar-bristle-hair-processing-co-v-united-states-cusc-1960.