Almanza v. State

645 S.W.2d 885
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 4, 1983·No. 2-81-340-CR·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

FENDER, Chief Justice.

Our prior opinion is withdrawn.

We reverse and remand.

Although many recent opinions have offhandedly dismissed the changing of “and” in the indictment to “or” in the court’s charge, such approach is dangerous and usually fatal in matters where aggravation or jurisdiction is involved. In the instant cause of aggravated rape the indictment joined the allegation of threats of death to the standard form allegation of rape by the word and. In the court’s charge the aggravation feature was disjoined from rape by the word or. Such constitutes fundamental error. Messenger v. State, 638 S.W.2d 883 (Tex.Cr.App.1982).

The cause is reversed and remanded to the trial court for further proceedings under this indictment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Almanza v. State, 645 S.W.2d 885 (Tex. Ct. App. 1983).

645 S.W.2d 885 (Almanza v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kenashica Darpre Davison v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
Pate, Chadrick B
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
Drake Jordan Finch v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
Almanza v. State
724 S.W.2d 805 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1986)
Almanza v. State
696 S.W.2d 282 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1985)
Hilton v. State
659 S.W.2d 154 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1983)
Lewis v. State
656 S.W.2d 472 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1983)