Almanza v. State

645 S.W.2d 885
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 4, 1983
Docket2-81-340-CR
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 645 S.W.2d 885 (Almanza v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Almanza v. State, 645 S.W.2d 885 (Tex. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

FENDER, Chief Justice.

Our prior opinion is withdrawn.

We reverse and remand.

Although many recent opinions have offhandedly dismissed the changing of “and” in the indictment to “or” in the court’s charge, such approach is dangerous and usually fatal in matters where aggravation or jurisdiction is involved. In the instant cause of aggravated rape the indictment joined the allegation of threats of death to the standard form allegation of rape by the word and. In the court’s charge the aggravation feature was disjoined from rape by the word or. Such constitutes fundamental error. Messenger v. State, 638 S.W.2d 883 (Tex.Cr.App.1982).

The cause is reversed and remanded to the trial court for further proceedings under this indictment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kenashica Darpre Davison v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
Pate, Chadrick B
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
Drake Jordan Finch v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
Almanza v. State
724 S.W.2d 805 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1986)
Almanza v. State
696 S.W.2d 282 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1985)
Hilton v. State
659 S.W.2d 154 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1983)
Lewis v. State
656 S.W.2d 472 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
645 S.W.2d 885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/almanza-v-state-texapp-1983.