Almanza v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Almanza v. State

570 So. 2d 363, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8274, 1990 WL 165014

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 31, 1990

DocketNo. 89-2172

StatusPublished

This text of 570 So. 2d 363 (Almanza v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Almanza v. State, 570 So. 2d 363, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8274, 1990 WL 165014 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Ruperto Almanza, was convicted of trafficking in cocaine and conspiracy to traffic in cocaine and was sentenced to fifteen (15) years in the Department of Corrections and a $250,000.00 fine.

The state concedes a Richardson violation which requires a reversal and remand. Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla.1971); Smith v. State, 500 So.2d 125 (Fla.1987).

We affirm as to the remaining appellate points.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

[364]*364DOWNEY and WALDEN, JJ., and WESSEL, JOHN D„ Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI