Almand v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Almand v. State

171 S.E. 297, 177 Ga. 727, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 398

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 10, 1933·No. No. 9664·Published

Opinion

Beck, P. J.

1. The evidence authorized the verdict, of guilty.

2. Even if the evidence offered by the accused was sufficient to raise the question of his sanity or insanity, the evidence on that subject was sufficient to authorize the jury to find that the defendant was sane and mentally capable of committing a crime; and there is no exception to the charge of the court instructing the jrxry as to this issue and the law applicable thereto. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beck, P. J.

1. The evidence authorized the verdict, of guilty.

2. Even if the evidence offered by the accused was sufficient to raise the question of his sanity or insanity, the evidence on that subject was sufficient to authorize the jury to find that the defendant was sane and mentally capable of committing a crime; and there is no exception to the charge of the court instructing the jrxry as to this issue and the law applicable thereto. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Almand v. State, 171 S.E. 297, 177 Ga. 727, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 398 (Ga. 1933).

Pincite

171 S.E. 297 (Almand v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.