Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Almand v. Seamans

Almand v. Seamans

15 S.E. 320, 89 Ga. 309
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 16, 1892
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 15 S.E. 320 (Almand v. Seamans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Almand v. Seamans, 15 S.E. 320, 89 Ga. 309 (Ga. 1892).

Opinion

[309]*309 Judgment reversed.

“ If you should find that the other half of the property was owned by II. D. George at the time whop he separated from his wife, and that afterwards a final verdict of divorcement was rendered, in which an allowance was made, set out and declared for the support of his child, and that this execution is levied for the purpose of enforcing the collection of such support for the child, then it would be your duty to find the north half of the property subject; and if these facts do not appear, you will find that half not subject also.” J. N. Glenn and A. C. MoCalla, for plaintiffs in error. George W. Gleaton, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fletcher v. Fletcher
238 S.E.2d 753 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)
Byrd v. Byrd
126 S.E.2d 270 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)
Stephens v. Stephens
148 S.E. 522 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1929)
In re Westmoreland
298 F. 484 (N.D. Georgia, 1924)
Singleton v. Close
61 S.E. 722 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1908)
Russell v. Rice
30 S.E. 37 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 S.E. 320, 89 Ga. 309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/almand-v-seamans-ga-1892.