Almand v. Maxwell

27 S.E. 176, 100 Ga. 318, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 50
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 21, 1897
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 27 S.E. 176 (Almand v. Maxwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Almand v. Maxwell, 27 S.E. 176, 100 Ga. 318, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 50 (Ga. 1897).

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

The superior courts have no power by writ of certiorari to award new trials in inferior judicatories upon the ground of alleged newly discovered evidence. The verdict of the jury in the present case was supported 'by the evidence. No error of law was committed, as appears from (the record, and the judge did not err in overruling tihe certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring. Maddox & Terrell and $. D. Jtilmson, for plaintiff in •error. 'Oowrtland S. Winn, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Caswell v. State
63 S.E. 566 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)
Laffitte v. State
31 S.E. 540 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 S.E. 176, 100 Ga. 318, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/almand-v-maxwell-ga-1897.