Almahdi v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Almahdi v. Commonwealth

876 N.E.2d 420, 450 Mass. 1005, 2007 Mass. LEXIS 732

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedNovember 9, 2007

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 876 N.E.2d 420 (Almahdi v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Almahdi v. Commonwealth, 876 N.E.2d 420, 450 Mass. 1005, 2007 Mass. LEXIS 732 (Mass. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Al Hajj Maliki Almahdi (defendant) appeals from a judgment of the county court denying his petition under G. L. c. 211, § 3, in which he sought bail review. The Commonwealth has moved to dismiss the appeal as moot. We agree with the Commonwealth.

After the single justice denied relief, the defendant was released on personal recognizance. The charges against him were subsequently disposed of, one by a nolle prosequi and the other by dismissal after a continuance without a finding. G. L. c. 276, § 87. This renders his claim for bail review moot. See Allen v. Commonwealth, 449 Mass. 1020, 1020 (2007), citing LaChance v. Commonwealth, 437 Mass. 1013 (2002). To the extent that the defendant claims he is entitled to compensation for time spent in confinement, that claim is not properly before us and we express no view on its merits. A proper forum for such a claim would be a civil action commenced in the trial court.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Al Hajj Maliki Almahdi (defendant) appeals from a judgment of the county court denying his petition under G. L. c. 211, § 3, in which he sought bail review. The Commonwealth has moved to dismiss the appeal as moot. We agree with the Commonwealth.

After the single justice denied relief, the defendant was released on personal recognizance. The charges against him were subsequently disposed of, one by a nolle prosequi and the other by dismissal after a continuance without a finding. G. L. c. 276, § 87. This renders his claim for bail review moot. See Allen v. Commonwealth, 449 Mass. 1020, 1020 (2007), citing LaChance v. Commonwealth, 437 Mass. 1013 (2002). To the extent that the defendant claims he is entitled to compensation for time spent in confinement, that claim is not properly before us and we express no view on its merits. A proper forum for such a claim would be a civil action commenced in the trial court.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

876 N.E.2d 420, 450 Mass. 1005, 2007 Mass. LEXIS 732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/almahdi-v-commonwealth-mass-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack