Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Alma State Bank v. Herrin

Alma State Bank v. Herrin

128 S.E. 16, 34 Ga. App. 57, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 32
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 14, 1925
Docket16312
StatusPublished

This text of 128 S.E. 16 (Alma State Bank v. Herrin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alma State Bank v. Herrin, 128 S.E. 16, 34 Ga. App. 57, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 32 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The verdict is amply supported by the evidence, and there being no error of law complained of, the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. E. E. Williams, for plaintiff. I. J. Bussell, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
128 S.E. 16, 34 Ga. App. 57, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alma-state-bank-v-herrin-gactapp-1925.