Alma Salman v. KIPP, INC.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 23, 2020·No. 01-19-00886-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Alma Salman v. KIPP, INC.

Appellate case number: 01-19-00886-CV

Trial court case number: 2016-44671

Trial court: 334th District Court of Harris County

Appellee KIPP, Inc., has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction, asserting that appellant’s notice of appeal was untimely filed one day after the 30-day deadline provided in Rule 26.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. The motion to dismiss is denied. The time to file a notice of appeal may be extended if, within 15 days after the deadline to file the notice of appeal, a party files a motion for extension. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. In civil cases, a motion for extension of time is implied when a notice of appeal is filed after the rule 26.1 deadline but within the 15-day extension period provided by rule 26.3. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Because appellant’s notice of appeal was filed one day after the deadline, we imply an extension request rendering the notice of appeal timely.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___/s/ Sarah B. Landau_________ Acting individually

Date: ___January 23, 2020___

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alma Salman v. KIPP, INC., (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Alma Salman v. KIPP, INC. (Alma Salman v. KIPP, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Verburgt v. Dorner
959 S.W.2d 615 (Texas Supreme Court, 1998)