Allyn v. Davis

10 Vt. 547
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided March 15, 1838·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

The service was not made agreeably to the rules of this court. The person authorized should have been named in the order, made by the chancellor signing the subpcena. A defendant is not bound to notice any service unless made by a regular officer, or a person duly authorized by name, or by a publication made agreeably to the rules of the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allyn v. Davis, 10 Vt. 547 (Vt. 1838).

10 Vt. 547 (Allyn v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.