Allston v. Allston
20 S.C.L. 362
This text of 20 S.C.L. 362 (Allston v. Allston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Allston v. Allston, 20 S.C.L. 362 (S.C. Ct. App. 1834).
Opinion
It is always understood that a note endorsed for the maker’s accommodation, to be discounted in Bank, is to be renewed ; and although each successive renewal is a new contract, it is not an extinguishment of the debt, and therefore such renewal will not destroy the security of a mortgage or other guaranty given to indemnify the endorser, when the original note was discounted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
20 S.C.L. 362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allston-v-allston-scctapp-1834.