Allstate Insurance v. Perkins
This text of 327 F. App'x 518 (Allstate Insurance v. Perkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
After reviewing the briefs, hearing oral argument, and relying on pertinent por *519 tions of the record, we affirm the district court judgment denying defense coverage to Willie J. Perkins, Sr., William J. Perkins, Jr., and Sheriel Perkins, Appellants, by Allstate Insurance Company. However, we vacate the sanction award against Willie Perkins, Sr., because it was not based on wilful misconduct or bad faith and therefore was an abuse of discretion. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of Am. v. Energy Gathering, Inc., 2 F.3d 1397, 1410-11 (5th Cir.1993) (upholding a court’s inherent power to sanction bad faith conduct); Pressey v. Patterson, 898 F.2d 1018, 1021 (5th Cir.1990) (“We have confined sanctions under the district court’s inherent power to instances of bad faith or willful abuse of the judicial process.”) AFFIRMED IN PART AND VACATED IN PART. See 5th Circuit Loc. Rule 47.6.
Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *519 published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
327 F. App'x 518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allstate-insurance-v-perkins-ca5-2009.