Allstate Insurance v. Perkins

327 F. App'x 518
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 22, 2009
Docket08-60993
StatusUnpublished

This text of 327 F. App'x 518 (Allstate Insurance v. Perkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allstate Insurance v. Perkins, 327 F. App'x 518 (5th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

After reviewing the briefs, hearing oral argument, and relying on pertinent por *519 tions of the record, we affirm the district court judgment denying defense coverage to Willie J. Perkins, Sr., William J. Perkins, Jr., and Sheriel Perkins, Appellants, by Allstate Insurance Company. However, we vacate the sanction award against Willie Perkins, Sr., because it was not based on wilful misconduct or bad faith and therefore was an abuse of discretion. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of Am. v. Energy Gathering, Inc., 2 F.3d 1397, 1410-11 (5th Cir.1993) (upholding a court’s inherent power to sanction bad faith conduct); Pressey v. Patterson, 898 F.2d 1018, 1021 (5th Cir.1990) (“We have confined sanctions under the district court’s inherent power to instances of bad faith or willful abuse of the judicial process.”) AFFIRMED IN PART AND VACATED IN PART. See 5th Circuit Loc. Rule 47.6.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *519 published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
327 F. App'x 518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allstate-insurance-v-perkins-ca5-2009.