Allstate Insurance v. Miles

280 A.D.2d 472, 719 N.Y.S.2d 717, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1194
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 5, 2001
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 280 A.D.2d 472 (Allstate Insurance v. Miles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allstate Insurance v. Miles, 280 A.D.2d 472, 719 N.Y.S.2d 717, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1194 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—In a proceeding to temporarily stay arbitration of a claim for uninsured motorist benefits, Alexander Miles appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Mason, J.), dated April 18, 2000, which granted the petition and denied his cross motion to compel arbitration, and for costs, fees, and sanctions.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, with costs, by deleting the provisions thereof granting the petitioner’s motion and denying that branch of cross motion which was to compel arbitration and substituting therefor provisions denying the motion and granting that branch of the cross motion; as so modified the order is affirmed, with costs to the appellant.

Pursuant to CPLR 7503 (c), an application to stay arbitration must be made within 20 days after service of the demand for arbitration. The petitioner’s application for a temporary stay of arbitration was made more than 20 days after service of the appellant’s demand. The petitioner’s application was, therefore, untimely and must be denied (see, Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. [Gonzalez], 161 AD2d 424; see also, Matter of Land of the Free v Unique Sanitation, 246 AD2d 546; Matter of Worldwide Ins. Group v Wing, 202 AD2d 682).

In any event, since the record indicates that the petitioner had ample time before the commencement of the instant proceeding within which to seek discovery of the appellant as provided by the insurance policy, and unjustifiably failed to utilize that opportunity, the petitioner should not now be granted a temporary stay of arbitration pending such discovery (see, Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Faulk, 250 AD2d 674; Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Urena, 208 AD2d 623). Santucci, J. P., Altman, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Government Empls. Ins. Co. v. Vargas
2025 NY Slip Op 51798(U) (New York Supreme Court, Kings County, 2025)
Fiveco, Inc. v. Haber
42 A.D.3d 454 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Naber Electric Corp. v. Hawthorne Cedar Knolls Union Free School District
40 A.D.3d 595 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
State-Wide Insurance v. Womble
25 A.D.3d 713 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
280 A.D.2d 472, 719 N.Y.S.2d 717, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allstate-insurance-v-miles-nyappdiv-2001.