Allstate Insurance v. Harris
This text of 57 A.D.3d 232 (Allstate Insurance v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We decline to reach respondent National Grange Mutual Insurance Company’s argument, advanced for the first time on appeal, that an insurer need not file a notice of termination with the Commissioner of the Department of Motor Vehicles after the insured has failed to pay a renewal premium on a policy that had been in force for six months. Were we to consider this argument, we would find it without merit, as it relies on a version of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 313 (2) (a) that has not been in effect since 1998 (see L 1998, ch 509). Concur — Tom, J.E, Nardelli, McGuire, Acosta and DeGrasse, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
57 A.D.3d 232, 867 N.Y.2d 679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allstate-insurance-v-harris-nyappdiv-2008.