Allstate Insurance v. Guida

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Allstate Insurance v. Guida

205 A.D.2d 532, 614 N.Y.S.2d 284, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5917

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 6, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 205 A.D.2d 532 (Allstate Insurance v. Guida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allstate Insurance v. Guida, 205 A.D.2d 532, 614 N.Y.S.2d 284, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7503 to stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, Continental Reinsurance Company appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated May 26, 1992 (Kassoff, J., on order and judgment; Groh, J., on decision), which permanently stayed the arbitration.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The petitioner established a prima facie case that the vehicle allegedly responsible for the underlying accident was insured by the appellant. Since the appellant failed to rebut the petitioner’s prima facie case with evidence to establish that the vehicle allegedly responsible for the underlying accident was uninsured (see, Matter of Foster [MVAIC] 55 Misc 2d [533]*533784; cf., Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Karadag, 205 AD2d 531 [decided herewith]), the Supreme Court properly stayed the arbitration. Thompson, J. P., Rosenblatt, Ritter, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7503 to stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, Continental Reinsurance Company appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated May 26, 1992 (Kassoff, J., on order and judgment; Groh, J., on decision), which permanently stayed the arbitration.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The petitioner established a prima facie case that the vehicle allegedly responsible for the underlying accident was insured by the appellant. Since the appellant failed to rebut the petitioner’s prima facie case with evidence to establish that the vehicle allegedly responsible for the underlying accident was uninsured (see, Matter of Foster [MVAIC] 55 Misc 2d [533]*533784; cf., Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Karadag, 205 AD2d 531 [decided herewith]), the Supreme Court properly stayed the arbitration. Thompson, J. P., Rosenblatt, Ritter, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 A.D.2d 532, 614 N.Y.S.2d 284, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allstate-insurance-v-guida-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack