Allstate Insurance v. Feldman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Allstate Insurance v. Feldman

65 A.D.2d 571, 409 N.Y.S.2d 150, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13221

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 10, 1978

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 65 A.D.2d 571 (Allstate Insurance v. Feldman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allstate Insurance v. Feldman, 65 A.D.2d 571, 409 N.Y.S.2d 150, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13221 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to stay arbitration, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered March 9, 1978, which granted the application. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Whether there was contact posed a pure question of fact, and we would not be warranted in overruling the court’s finding in that regard. With respect to the timeliness of the service of the notice of petition to stay arbitration, the law set forth in Matter of Empire Mut. Ins. Co. (Levy) (35 AD2d 916) is applicable although the case is somewhat distin[572]*572guishable on the facts. Latham, J. P., Suozzi, Gulotta, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to stay arbitration, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered March 9, 1978, which granted the application. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Whether there was contact posed a pure question of fact, and we would not be warranted in overruling the court’s finding in that regard. With respect to the timeliness of the service of the notice of petition to stay arbitration, the law set forth in Matter of Empire Mut. Ins. Co. (Levy) (35 AD2d 916) is applicable although the case is somewhat distin[572]*572guishable on the facts. Latham, J. P., Suozzi, Gulotta, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 A.D.2d 571, 409 N.Y.S.2d 150, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allstate-insurance-v-feldman-nyappdiv-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack