Allstate Insurance v. Bryan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Allstate Insurance v. Bryan

223 A.D.2d 701, 637 N.Y.S.2d 211, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 703

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 29, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 223 A.D.2d 701 (Allstate Insurance v. Bryan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allstate Insurance v. Bryan, 223 A.D.2d 701, 637 N.Y.S.2d 211, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 703 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7503 to stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, Farm Family Mutual Insurance Company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DiNoto, J.), entered June 8, 1994, which permanently stayed arbitration.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Inasmuch as the appellant failed to comply with the billing provisions set forth in Rules of the New York Automobile Insurance Plan § 14 (E) (2) and § 18 (2), the subsequent cancellation by the appellant was ineffective and coverage on the offending vehicle remained in effect on the day of the accident (see, Matter of Home Indem. Co. v Scricca, 147 AD2d 697; Eveready Ins. v Mitchell, 133 AD2d 210). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Joy, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7503 to stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, Farm Family Mutual Insurance Company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DiNoto, J.), entered June 8, 1994, which permanently stayed arbitration.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Inasmuch as the appellant failed to comply with the billing provisions set forth in Rules of the New York Automobile Insurance Plan § 14 (E) (2) and § 18 (2), the subsequent cancellation by the appellant was ineffective and coverage on the offending vehicle remained in effect on the day of the accident (see, Matter of Home Indem. Co. v Scricca, 147 AD2d 697; Eveready Ins. v Mitchell, 133 AD2d 210). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Joy, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

223 A.D.2d 701, 637 N.Y.S.2d 211, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allstate-insurance-v-bryan-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack