Allstate Insurance v. Ben-Ari

228 A.D.2d 458, 643 N.Y.2d 671, 643 N.Y.S.2d 671, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6611

Opinions

The subject insurance policy contains a provision permitting either party to demand a trial de novo where, as here, the amount of the arbitration award exceeds the limit specified by Insurance Law § 3420 (f) (1). The right to make such a demand is linked, however, to the procedures governing common-law arbitration proceedings. In this case, the parties proceeded to arbitration in accordance with the rules applicable to the American Arbitration Association, and not in accordance with the policy provisions. Under the circumstances, we conclude that the appellant was not entitled to invoke the trial de novo provision of the policy (see, Matter of Eckart v Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 208 AD2d 533). Rosenblatt, J. P., Copertino, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allstate Insurance v. Ben-Ari, 228 A.D.2d 458, 643 N.Y.2d 671, 643 N.Y.S.2d 671, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6611 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

228 A.D.2d 458 (Allstate Insurance v. Ben-Ari) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Freedman v. Chemical Construction Corp.
372 N.E.2d 12 (New York Court of Appeals, 1977)
Eckart v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
208 A.D.2d 533 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)