Allstate Insurance Co. v. VanHouten

710 So. 2d 727, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5272, 1998 WL 236277
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 13, 1998
DocketNo. 97-2767
StatusPublished

This text of 710 So. 2d 727 (Allstate Insurance Co. v. VanHouten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allstate Insurance Co. v. VanHouten, 710 So. 2d 727, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5272, 1998 WL 236277 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant complains that the trial court erred in sua sponte requiring the jury to reconsider the appellees’ damages on the ground that the verdict was inconsistent. Based on Allstate Insurance Co. v. Manasse, 707 So.2d 1110 (Fla.1998), the appellees concede error. We therefore reverse and remand for entry of a judgment in accordance with the initial verdict in this case.

WARNER, POLEN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Manasse
707 So. 2d 1110 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
710 So. 2d 727, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5272, 1998 WL 236277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allstate-insurance-co-v-vanhouten-fladistctapp-1998.